about_faces: (Default)
Sometimes, I like to wonder about the stories which were never told, or the ones that could have easily gone in a different direction but for a small twist of fate. I think about this with stories in general, but of course, my biggest interest is in the Harvey Dent stories that never were.

As I've been a fan of the character for a long time, I've always had my eye out for news about the character in Wizard and sites like Newsarama and Comic Book Resources, and there have been times when I've learned about an upcoming Two-Face story that never actually ends up getting released, or else it gets replaced at the last minute without explanation. As you might imagine, this is always disappointing, but there are some instances where it's actually painful, since many of these stories might have drastically changed the direction of the character, and perhaps may have even altered the status of Harvey in the esteem of fandom. As such, when I look back at those untold stories, I can't help but wonder what might have been.

But thanks to you fine followers of this blog, I no longer need wonder alone! So over the next few weeks, let's examine these abandoned Two-Face appearances from comics, TV, and film, so that we can speculate what they might have been like and what impact they might have had, for good or ill. I'm also going to need your help verifying the veracity of these projects, since many of those articles and news sites are now defunct, and I'm solely going by my own faulty memory of stuff I'd once heard about years ago. As such, any information anyone has to prove or disprove the almost-existence of these stories would be greatly appreciated.

Seeing as how we're on the precipice of The Dark Knight Rises, I think it's best to start with the unproduced projects for TV and film which would have given the character mass exposure outside the ever-shrinking realm of comics fandom. With that in mind, let's begin with one of the more famous examples:


CLINT EASTWOOD AS TWO-FACE ON THE 60'S BATMAN TV SHOW (1968)



What was it supposed to be?
Two years after the release of The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly, Clint Eastwood had supposedly been cast to be Two-Face in the Batman TV show. This would not only have brought the character into the show, but it also would have been his first appearance since he vanished from the comics in 1954. For the show, Two-Face's origin would be changed so that he would be a TV anchorman who got scarred when a klieg light exploded, following (the Silver Age revision of) the origin of Paul Sloane, the second Impostor Two-Face.



What did we get instead?
Nothing, because the show was cancelled before the episode was made!

LOL, u Bat-mad?



Do I have any proof that this almost existed?
Only wiki entries such as Wikipedia and DC Wiki, but their sources aren't as solid as I'd prefer. I'm fairly certain that one of you folks linked me to a more reputable source, but I can't remember what that was. If anyone can point it my way, I'll add it to this post. According to this link, it looks verified! And there was apparently a script by Harlan Frickin' Ellison, no less! Egad!


Can I come up with any speculation, baseless or otherwise, as to what it might have been like?
Since the show often faithfully adapted actual comics stories from the era, I imagine that any Two-Face episode of the Batman show would have been based around the more outlandish, late-period Golden Age Two-Face stories by Dick Sprang, such as the George Blake impostor story (maybe complete with the floating balloon decoy twin brother head?). Even more likely, it could have drawn inspiration from Two-Face Strikes Again! There would be bad puns galore, lots of outlandish crimes based around the number two, attacks on people who have "two faces," and maybe even the giant-coin deathtrap, if they could have found a low-budget way to pull it off.




Could we be better off that it never happened?
Possibly, possibly not. On one hand, it's likely that Two-Face's appearance in the show would have given the character added exposure to pop culture at large, so that he wouldn't be an obscure character to non-comics readers until his appearances in TV and film decades down the line. On the other hand, the show's take on Two-Face might have solidified the view of the character as a pun-spewing, weird-looking joke character even worse than the comics did!

Bear in mind, it took the Riddler decades to shake the stigma of being associated with that show, a stigma which the Penguin still seems to carry to some extent. Consider how Denny O'Neil, the man who helped revitalize the status of Two-Face in the Bronze Age, treated the Riddler in a 1989 issue of The Question:


Maybe O'Neil was just lashing out on behalf of every frustrated writer who struggled and failed to write Eddie well.


Perhaps it's mainly the fact that Harvey was excluded from the show that his triumphant return to comics in the O'Neil/Adams classic Half an Evil packed such a punch, simply because it brought in a refreshingly grotesque and tragic character to counteract the bright, colorful, silly camp of the show. After that issue, Two-Face became one of the main Batman villains throughout the 70's, whereas TV favorites like the Riddler and the Penguin started to languish in the comics. I don't think that's a coincidence. As such, I believe that Harvey became such a major character simply because he wasn't on the show.

But of course, that status comes with a trade-off. While he became a major character in the comics, Two-Face remained virtually unknown to the world at large until Batman: The Animated Series and especially (unfortunately) Batman Forever. Meanwhile, everyone knows who the Penguin is, and even if he's looked down upon and unappreciated by actual comics readers, Pengers (specifically the squawking Meredith version) still endures as a figure in pop culture. Two examples that come to mind are how Jon Stewart has gotten a lot of milage from comparing Dick Cheney to Penguin, and the character even made a quick cameo in a recent episode of The Simpsons.




Ultimately, I think it was better that the character remained obscure and known only to comics fans, because that retained the tragic aspect more than he probably would have gotten from the TV show. An anchorman is hardly the same kind of heroic paragon of justice that a District Attorney represents, after all. Still, I would have loved to have seen what Clint's Two-Face would have been like, and what they would have done with his makeup. I also wonder what (if any) impact that playing Two-Face would have had on his career. If it had continued largely unchanged, perhaps both he and Harvey would have found new meaning with the line, "Do you feel lucky?"

about_faces: (Movie Faces of Harvey Dent)
Up until today, I couldn't bring myself bring myself to summon up any feelings stronger than mild anxiousness mingled with dull apathy. As far as I was (and still am, generally) concerned, maybe it'll be awesome, maybe it'll be crap, maybe it'll be a shambling monster fiasco of a film, but I can't bring myself to care.

Even years later, I still feel burned out from both the hype for and fallout from The Dark Knight, especially with my conflicted feelings about how Harvey was handled. I really need to update those thoughts, since some of those critiques have changed with time, but they're more or less the same as how I still feel Nolan's take on Harvey. As such, I'm really not sure how to feel about the fact that not even death is going to keep Harvey entirely out of TDKRises, as evidenced by this new bit of viral marketing.



HARVEY DENT DAY! And there's a parade, too! Wait, is this a solemn occasion, or a celebration? Wait, why can't we have it both ways? That's the true meaning of Harvey Dent Day! You can read the rest of the fake newspaper over at Comics Alliance, where you'll find more possible clues about TDKRises along with a couple very unsubtle product placements for Mountain Dew products, since they're the ones handling the viral marketing now. I hate that, honestly. And while there are no more references to Harvey, I can't help but feel like some of those horoscopes sound a wee bit like Two-Face in theme, although that's almost certainly just me reading too much into things.

So as the end of TDK indicated, Harvey is now a martyr, and Batman has taken the blame for his crimes. Not too long ago, I read about Nolan saying how Commissioner Gordon actually created something called the "Dent Act," which he used to successfully clean up Gotham City over the eight years between TDK and TDKRises. Of course, Gordon and Batman have suppressed the full truth of Harvey's actions, a lie which it appears that Bane might expose based on this photo of Bane holding a smaller photo. I understand that he actually tears up this image, meaning that either Bane knows the truth about Harvey, or else he's just symbolically destroying the image of Gotham's martyr because he's evil and crap. Either way, he's using Harvey's legacy to his own ends.

But it turns out, Bane isn't the only one. Another piece of viral marketing revealed a fake press release from Gotham Mayor Alpert Eyeliner Bat-Manuel, which actually explains what the "Dent Act" does, and thus sheds new light about how Gordon and Batman have used the dead Harvey to further their own agendas:



It sounds an awful lot like Gordon--with the Mayor's endorsement--has used Harvey's memory to turn Gotham into something of a police state. If so, this is a troubling prospect indeed.

While Harvey was willing to bend the rules, he was never the type to outright support the removal of rights such as parole. It makes you wonder just what else has been taken away in the name of enforcing law and order, especially unrest and protests similar to the Occupy movement seem to be a central part of TDKRises' conflict. If the government and the heroes have "saved" the city through extreme order, then it's no wonder that Bane seems to be rallying together his own army of citizens in response. At least, that's what I'm getting from this image.



If the people in that poster as well as this one indeed are angry Gotham citizens rather than Bane's (or perhaps Ra's, maybe possibly?) own private army, then it looks like the reckoning that Bane represents is the response to the oppressive war on crime that Gordon and Batman have waged in Harvey's name.

And that's when I thought of something which actually gave me chills. If my deductions are correct, then maybe, just maybe, Nolan still has something to say about Harvey after all. If all this is true, then the real legacy of Harvey Dent is a city at war with itself, on the verge of being torn in two.

Holy. Crap.

Now, I don't think that idea honestly would have occurred to Nolan, since he had no interest in exploring any of Harvey's internal conflict or any of his psychological duality or anything like that. Hell, I don't even know if the Dent Act really does result in a police state, or if there's any social class unrest as a result. This is the main reason why I haven't been playing the speculation game with TDKRises, simply because this could all be empty wanking on my part, and I will have worked myself up to be excited about something which won't actually be there in the final product.

Ultimately, there's only one thing I can do with certainty, and that's make fun of how ridiculous Bane looks. Hey, did I ever mention how much I thought he looked like a certain crazy alien lobster doctor? Well, good news, everyone! My brilliant thinking actually inspired someone to start up an entire Tumblr of "ZoidBane!"



Yes, this blog shall do well to tide me over until the Dent Day celebrations.

Profile

about_faces: (Default)
about_faces

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123 456
789 10 111213
14151617181920
2122 2324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 06:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios