One of the all-time great Two-Face stories is also, in my opinion, probably the worst thing to ever happen to him as a character. Which is to say, I love Two-Face Strikes Again! as a classic example of 50's Batman at its Sprang-iest fun, but I hate how it changed Harvey in ways that can still be seen in most bad Two-Face stories today.
So yeah, not to go all Chuck Dixon on you with the puns, but I'm of two minds about this one.

Also, I'm not sure who the hell drew that lousy cover, but I'm betting it wasn't Sprang. It's not often that a comic's interior art so greatly outshines the cover. That said, what kind of farm uses catapult tractors, and where the hell can I get one?
The problem with this story isn't just the way Two-Face is written, nor the way in which he's brought back. In some ways--and I can't believe that I'm saying this--Two-Face never should have returned at all! I suspect that he was never MEANT to be a recurring villain, based on the fact that the original Golden Age "Harvey Kent" trilogy was just that: a complete story, one which ended with the character's redemption and rehabilitation.
Sure, there were new Two-Face stories that followed, but as it seems like Bill Finger and company didn't want to sacrifice Harvey's happy ending, they decided to have it both ways by introducing a series of Impostor Two-Faces, each of whom became progressively ridiculous to fit the title's shift towards the Silver Age and, eventually, Adam West. This was also, mind you, the Golden Age of crime and horror comics, especially from EC, and thus it was in this iconic final stage of Batman's Golden Age--the legendary Dick Sprang era--that the temptation apparently became too great for DC. It was time to bring back the One True Two-Face.
This, of course, meant ruining Harvey Kent/Dent's happy ending, and the implied subsequent divorce from Gilda. Boo-urns! That would be bad enough on its own, but could have worked if the story continued the original trilogy's themes of duality and tragedy. Except that we were in the Sprang era, so LOL NO. The returned Harvey Dent more closely resembled the outlandish evil silliness of Impostor #3, George ("Here comes DOUBLE TROUBLE! HAHA!") Blake rather than the morose and surprisingly complex Harvey Kent. What once was a powerfully tragic and sympathic figure became a freaky-looking maniac obsessed with the number 2.
( Now, that's not to say the story isn't fun as hell... )
If you'd like to read this story in full, you have SEVERAL options, as it's been reprinted in four different volumes: Batman with Robin the Boy Wonder: From the 30's to the 70's, Batman in the Fifties, The Greatest 1950's Stories Ever Told, and Batman VS Two-Face.
The scans from this post have been taken from the last collection, and I suspect those pages were recolored for either the 1950's or Fifties collections. If you'd like to see what the ORIGINAL printed pages and coloring looked like--including Harvey's original gray scarring--you can read them here. I recommend it, as the original coloring is what's going to be referenced in the next post, when we finally look at Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams' Half an Evil.
So yeah, not to go all Chuck Dixon on you with the puns, but I'm of two minds about this one.

Also, I'm not sure who the hell drew that lousy cover, but I'm betting it wasn't Sprang. It's not often that a comic's interior art so greatly outshines the cover. That said, what kind of farm uses catapult tractors, and where the hell can I get one?
The problem with this story isn't just the way Two-Face is written, nor the way in which he's brought back. In some ways--and I can't believe that I'm saying this--Two-Face never should have returned at all! I suspect that he was never MEANT to be a recurring villain, based on the fact that the original Golden Age "Harvey Kent" trilogy was just that: a complete story, one which ended with the character's redemption and rehabilitation.
Sure, there were new Two-Face stories that followed, but as it seems like Bill Finger and company didn't want to sacrifice Harvey's happy ending, they decided to have it both ways by introducing a series of Impostor Two-Faces, each of whom became progressively ridiculous to fit the title's shift towards the Silver Age and, eventually, Adam West. This was also, mind you, the Golden Age of crime and horror comics, especially from EC, and thus it was in this iconic final stage of Batman's Golden Age--the legendary Dick Sprang era--that the temptation apparently became too great for DC. It was time to bring back the One True Two-Face.
This, of course, meant ruining Harvey Kent/Dent's happy ending, and the implied subsequent divorce from Gilda. Boo-urns! That would be bad enough on its own, but could have worked if the story continued the original trilogy's themes of duality and tragedy. Except that we were in the Sprang era, so LOL NO. The returned Harvey Dent more closely resembled the outlandish evil silliness of Impostor #3, George ("Here comes DOUBLE TROUBLE! HAHA!") Blake rather than the morose and surprisingly complex Harvey Kent. What once was a powerfully tragic and sympathic figure became a freaky-looking maniac obsessed with the number 2.
( Now, that's not to say the story isn't fun as hell... )
If you'd like to read this story in full, you have SEVERAL options, as it's been reprinted in four different volumes: Batman with Robin the Boy Wonder: From the 30's to the 70's, Batman in the Fifties, The Greatest 1950's Stories Ever Told, and Batman VS Two-Face.
The scans from this post have been taken from the last collection, and I suspect those pages were recolored for either the 1950's or Fifties collections. If you'd like to see what the ORIGINAL printed pages and coloring looked like--including Harvey's original gray scarring--you can read them here. I recommend it, as the original coloring is what's going to be referenced in the next post, when we finally look at Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams' Half an Evil.